Skip to main content

Cassie Lost in Lawst School

Cassie Lost in Lawst School

Search This Blog

CRIMINAL LAW

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

I. Criminal Law I

(A) Notes

Fundamental Principles

(B) Cases

People of the Philippines v. Wong Cheng
People of the Philippines v. Sara
People of the Philippines v. Pisalvo
People of the Philippines v. Oanis

II. Criminal Law II

(A) Notes

(B) Cases

People of the Philippines v. Romy Miranda G.R No. 231989
People of the Philippines v. Edgardo Royol y Asico G.R. No. 224297

Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

CASE DIGEST: Star Paper Corporation v. Simbol

STAR PAPER CORPORATION, JOSEPHINE ONGSITCO & SEBASTIAN CHUA, petitioners, vs. RONALDO D. SIMBOL, WILFREDA N. COMIA & LORNA E. ESTRELLA, respondents G.R. No. 164774 | April 12, 2006 TOPIC: Stipulation against marriage FACTS: Respondents Ronaldo D. Simbol, Wilfreda N. Comia and Lorna E. Estrella were all regular employees at Star Paper Corporation. During their employment in the company, Simbol and Comia, met their co-employees, Alma Dayrit and Howard Comia, and eventually married them. Prior to their respective marriages, Jospehine Ongsitco, the Manager of the Personnel and Administration Department, advised them that should they decide to get married, one of the should resign pursuant to a company policy promulgated in 1995, which states that: 1. New applicants will not be allowed to be hired if in case he/she has a relative, up to the 3rd degree of relationship, already employed by the company. 2. In case of two of

CASE DIGEST: Duncan Association v. Glaxo Welcome Philippines

DUNCAN ASSOCIATION OF DETAILMAN-PTGWO and PEDRO A. TECSON, petitioners, vs. GLAXO WELCOME PHILIPPINES, INC., respondent G.R. No. 162994 | September 17, 2004 TOPIC: Stipulation against marriage FACTS: Petitioner Pedro A. Tecson signed a contract of employment as Medical Representative with Glaxo Wellcome Philippines which stipulates, among others, that he agrees to study and abide by existing company rules; to disclose to management any existing or future relationship by consanguinity or affinity with co-employees or employees of competing drug companies and should management find that such relationship poses a possible conflict of interest, to resign from the company. The Employee Code of Conduct of Glaxo similarly provides that an employee is expected to inform management of any existing or future relationship by consanguinity or affinity with co-employees or employees of competing drug companies. If management perceives a conflict of inter

CASE DIGEST: Matling Industrial and Commercial Corporation v. Coros

MATLING INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, RICHARD K. SPENCER, CATHERINE SPENCER, AND ALEX MANCILLA, petitioners, vs. RICARDO R. COROS, respondent. G.R. No. 157802. October 13, 2010. FACTS: After his dismissal by Matling as its Vice President for Finance and Administration, the respondent filed a complaint for illegal suspension and illegal dismissal against Matling and some of its corporate officers (petitioners) in the NLRC, Sub-Regional Arbitration Branch XII, Iligan City. The petitioners moved to dismiss the complaint, raising the ground, among others, that the complaint pertained to the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) due to the controversy being intra-corporate inasmuch as the respondent was a member of Matling’s Board of Directors aside from being its Vice President for Finance and Administration prior to his termination. The LA granted the petitioners’ motion to dismiss, ruling that the respondent was a corporate officer because he w

Powered by Blogger