CASE DIGEST: Calalang v. Williams

 

MAXIMO CALALANG, petitioner, vs. A. D. WILLIAMS, ET AL., respondents

G. R. No. 47800                 December 2, 1940

FACTS:

Maximo Calalng, a private citizen, petition for a writ of prohibition against respondents, A. D. Williams, as Chairman of the National Traffic Commission; Vicente Fragante, as Director of Public Works; Sergio Bayan, as Acting Secretary of Public Works and Communications; Eulogio Rodriguez, as Mayor of the City of Manila; and Juan Dominguez, as Acting Chief of Police of Manila.

The petition stems from the prohibition of animal-drawn vehicles from passing along Rosario Street extending from Plaza Calderon de la Barca to Dasmarinas Street, from 7:30 AM to 12:30 PM and from 1:30 PM to 5:30 PM; and along Rizal Avenue extending from the railroad crossing at Antipolo Street to Azcarraga Street, from 7 AM to 11 PM., for a period of one year from the date of the opening of the Colgante Bridge to traffic. And that as a consequence, all animal-drawn vehicles are not able to pass and pick up passengers in the places above-mentioned to the detriment not only of their owners but of the riding public as well.

Furthermore, the petitioner claims that such infringes upon the constitutional precept regarding the promotion of social justice to insure the well-being and economic security of all the people.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the petitoner’s claims on infringement of social justice is correct.

RULING:

The promotion of social justice is to be achieved not through a mistaken sympathy towards any group. Social justice is “neither communism, nor despotism, no atomism, nor anarchy,” but the humanization of laws and the equalization of social and economic forces by the State so that justice in its rational and objectively secular conception may at least be approximated. Social justice means the promotion of the welfare of all the people, the adoption by the Government of measures calculated to insure economic stability of all the competent elements of society, through the maintenance of a proper economic and social equilibrium in the interrelations of the members of the community, constitutionally, through the adoption of measures legally justifiable, or extra-constitutionally, through the exercise of powers underlying the existence of all governments on the time-honored principle of salus populi est suprema lex. Social justice, therefore, must be founded on the recognition of the necessity of interdependence among divers and diverse units of a society and of the protection that should be equally and evenly extended to all groups as combined force in our social and economic life, consistent with the fundamental and paramount objective of the state of promoting the health, comfort, and quiet of all persons, and of bringing about “the greatest good to the greatest number.”

Comments