CASE DIGEST: Agile Maritime Resources Inc v. Siador

 


AGILE MARITIME RESOURCES, INC., ATTY. IMELDA LIM BARCELONA and PRONAV SHIP MANAGEMENT INC., petitioners, vs. APOLINARIO N. SIADOR, respondent
G.R. No. 191034                |              Oct. 1, 2014

FACTS:

About 2:00 PM of June 28, 2001, AB Tamayo saw Sennis Siador jump overboard from their vessel, LNG Aries, while they were cruising towards Sodegaura, Japan. Tamayo immediately informed 3rd Officer Milan Crnogorac who sounded the man-overboard alarm.

The Master of the vessel immediately ordered a life ring thrown into the water and put into motion the vessel’s man-overboard maneuver. Fitter Rolando Moreno was ordered to keep an eye on Dennis with the use of binoculars. Allegedly, Moreno saw Dennis floating on his back, making no effort to swim towards the life ring. He then saw Dennis sink in the water and disappear from sight despite the effort to rescue him. With the horizon darkening and the temperature remarkably dropping, the search and rescue effort was called off at 5:15 PM. Dennis’ body was never recovered.

On December 12, 2001, Apolinario Siador filed a complaint for death benefits, damages and attorney’s fees against petitioners for the death of his son.

The LA dismissed the complaint for lack of cause of action. The LA found that Dennis— saddled by heavy personal and psychological problems— took his own life by jumping overboard. The NLRC affirmed the LA’s ruling upon appeal.

The CA partially granted the petition. It sustained Apolinario’s position that prior to his death, Dennis had been suffering from mental instability, and therefore could not be considered to have intentionally taken his life. It cited the personal accounts of the Filipino crew members on Dennis’ unusual behavior days before the incident, which narrated that Dennis appeared to be very disturbed, anxious, depressed and restless.

ISSUE:

Whether or not there was substantial evidence to prove that Dennis’ death was directly attributable to his own action, hence, his death was not compensable

RULING:

In Great Southern Maritime Services Corp v. Leonila Surigao, the Court ruled that substantial evidence suffices for the employer to show that the seafarer committed suicide even if there was no eyewitness to its commission and the possibility of a contrary conclusion existed.

With the company’s discharge of the burden to prove its defense, the burden of evidence shifted to Apolinario to rebut the petitioners’ case. In other words, Apolinario has to prove by substantial evidence that   Dennis may be insane at the time he took his life.

Unlike the cases of Lapid v. NLRC and Naess Shipping Philippines Inc. v. NLRC, which were cited by the CA in upholding their decision, the circumstances surrounding Dennis were duly proven by the employer. That Dennis jumped, instead of fell, from the ship is a uniform finding of the labor tribunals and the CA. The employer also showed by substantial evidence what prompted Dennis to act as he did, without any contrary evidence submitted by Apolinario to dispute the employer’s evidence.

Since the POEA-SEC requires the employer to prove not only that the death is directly attributable to the seafarer himself but also that the seafarer willfully caused his death, evidence of insanity or mental sickness may be presented to negate the requirement of willfulness as a matter of counter-defense. Since the willfulness may be inferred from the physical act itself of the seafarer, the insanity or mental illness required to be proven must be one that deprived him of the full control of his senses; in other words, there must be sufficient proof to negate voluntariness.

But his strange behavior cannot be the basis for a finding of grave abuse of discretion because portions of the Crewmembers’ Statement itself rendered the basis for a finding of insanity insufficient. A few hours before the accident, Filipino crew members approached Dennis to ask him if anything was wrong with him and Dennis simply replied that everything was in order. No proof was ever adduced as well showing that whatever personal problems Dennis had were enough to negate the voluntariness he showed in stepping overboard.


Comments