INTERORIENT MARITIME ENTERPRISES, INC., FIRCROFT
SHIPPING CORPORATION and TIMES SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC., petitioners,
vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and CONSTANCIA PINEDA, respondents
G.R. No. 115497 | Sept. 16, 1996
FACTS:
Jeremias Pineda was contracted to work as
Oiler on board the vessel, MV Amazonia, from Dec. 21, 1988 to Sept. 28,1989. When he finished his
contract, he was discharged from the port of Dubai for repatriation to Manila.
During his layover in Bangkok, Thailand, he disembarked on his own free will
and failed to join the connecting flight to Hongkong. During which, he was shot
by a Thai Policeman and died. The police report submitted to the Philippine
Embassy in Bangkok confirmed that it was Pineda who ‘approached and tried to
stab the police sergeant with a knife and that therefore he was forced to pull
out his gun and shot Pineda.
The deceased’s mother, Constancia Pineda,
filed for death compensation benefits against Interorient Maritime Enterprises,
Inc. and it foreign principal, Fircroft Shipping Corporation and the Times
Surety and Insurance Co., Inc. They averred that the deceased seaman was
suffering from mental disorder aggravated by threats on his life by his fellow
seamen, the Ship Captain should not have allowed him to travel alone.
Respondent agency averred that they are not
liable to pay any death/burial benefits pursuant to the provisions of Par. 6,
Section C, Part II, POEA-SEC which states that ‘no compensation shall be
payable in respect of any injury, incapacity, disability or death resulting
from a willfull act on his own life by the seaman’; that the deceased seaman
died due to his own wilfull act in attacking a policeman in Bangkok who shot
him in self-defense.”
ISSUE:
Whether or not the local crewing or manning
agent and its foreign principal are liable for the death of a Filipino
seaman-employee who, after having been discharged, was killed in-transit while
being repatriated home
RULING:
Though the termination of the employment
contract was duly effected in Dubai, still, the responsibility of the foreign
employer to see to it that Pineda was duly repatriated to the point of hiring
subsisted. Section 4, Rule VIII of the Rules and Regulations Governing Overseas
Employment clearly provides for the duration of the mandatory personal accident
and life insurance covering accidental death, dismemberment and disability of
overseas workers:
“Section 4. Duration of Insurance Coverage.—The
minimum coverage shall take effect upon payment of the premium and shall be
extended worldwide, on and off the job, for the duration of the worker’s
contract plus 60 calendar days after termination of the contract of
employment’, provided that in no case shall the duration of the insurance
coverage be less than one year.”
The foreign employer may not have been
obligated by its contract to provide a companion for a returning employee, but
it cannot deny that it was expressly tasked by its agreement to assure the safe
return of said worker. The uncaring attitude displayed by petitioners who,
knowing fully well that its employee had been suffering from some mental
disorder, nevertheless still allowed him to travel home alone is appalling.
Comments
Post a Comment