16. Distinguish the following from each other:
a. Tax from toll;
|
TAX |
TOLL FEE |
Imposed by |
State |
Private persons |
Purpose |
Raise Revenues |
Reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in the construction of
toll ways , and to assure reasonable margin of income |
Basis |
State’s sovereign power |
Attribute of ownership |
b. Tax vs. penalty
|
TAX |
PENALTY |
Purpose |
To raise revenue |
To regulate conduct |
Imposed by |
State |
State, private individuals, entities |
c. Tax vs. special assessment -
|
TAX |
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT |
Imposed on |
Persons, Properties, etc. |
Only on land |
Why imposed |
Regardless of public improvement |
Public improvement benefits the land and increases its value ● Benefit is a condition sine qua non for special
assessment |
Purpose |
Support of government |
Contribution to cost of public improvement |
When impose |
Regular exaction |
Exceptional as to time and locality |
Basis |
Necessity |
Benefits obtained |
d. Tax vs. license or permit fees
|
TAX |
LICENSE FEE |
Source |
Taxing power |
Police Power of the State |
Purpose |
Raise Revenue |
Regulation |
Object |
Persons, property and privilege |
Right to exercise a privilege |
As to the amount |
No limit |
Only necessary to carry out regulation |
e. Tax from debt
Reminders: read the
cases
|
TAX |
DEBT |
Basis |
Based on law |
Based on contract |
W/N it is assignable |
Cannot generally be assigned |
assignable |
Payment |
Generally payable in money |
Maybe paid in kind |
As to whether nonpayment will lead to imprisonment |
Imprisonment is a sanction (xpn: poll tax) |
Imprisonment is not a sanction for nonpayment |
Tax is not an ordinary
debt. Ordinary debts are governed by the Civil Code.
CIR v. Pineda -- to
expedite collection of taxes; Gov’t can choose to assessed the entire tax
deficiency against one heir since the heirs are considered solidarily liable
Domingo v. Garlitos -
the State has become an ordinary creditor so set-off was allowed; State has
already appropriated money to pay the services of Mr. Scott Price thus they
have become mutual debtors and creditors of each other
Republic v. Mambulao
- a tax cannot be set off with another tax
Francia v. IAC - set
off not allowed because just compensation is a sovereign obligation the tax
assessed was only a municipal tax
17. What is the importance of a tax being distinguished from other
impositions?
It is important to differentiate taxes
from other exactions especially when it comes to problem/issues on double
taxation, tax exemptions, jurisdiction of the CTA, and taxpayer remedy (e.g.
Refund claims).
E.G.
1.)
If an exaction is not a tax, then
the defense of a taxpayer of double taxation will fail.
Also, a tax-exempt individual or corporation is generally only exempt from paying taxes; hence if the exaction is not a tax, then the individual or corporation must still pay the exaction
18. What is the rule of set-off of taxes with other debts?
GR: No set off or compensation is admissible against demands for taxes
levied for general or local purposes
REASON: Taxes are not in the nature
of contract between parties; the government and the taxpayer are not mutually
creditors and debtors of each other and the claim for taxes is not such a debt,
demand, contract or judgment as is allowed to be set off
XPN:
when both the claims of the government and the
taxpayer against each other have already become due and demandable as well as
fully liquidated
Comments
Post a Comment